Talk:Carolyn Wells

Latest comment: 9 days ago by 173.233.167.50 in topic Poetry importance
edit

I reverted the edit which removed this link. The link is not spam, it links to a good scholarly discussion of Well's work. The overall site that the link is part of is a discussion of classic mystery writing since the 1800's. The page (not mine, BTW) contains no advertising or promotion. If there is a good reason to remove the link, please post it, but don't just lazily call it spam. Boomcoach (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

How is it lazy to call it spam after a single purpose account adds it to oodles of pages? I'm not going to object to established editors re-adding it, however. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am not the user mentioned, but I will accept that you think that if Nzkpzq adds it, like he has dozens of other links, it may be spam. I added it because it was an author I was interested in and it had what I felt was worthwhile content. I am not interested in an edit war and, I will fully admit, only a casual WP editor. Boomcoach (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Poetry importance

edit

I believe that your categorization of "Low importance" in Poetry is incorrect. Carolyn Wells wrote a great many limericks, including some of the most famous limericks in the world. The Jingle Book is available from the Library of Congress. If you have not read it, then I suggest that you do. agb 173.233.167.50 (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply