Talk:Carpetani

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Solomonfromfinland in topic Red links

Citation problem

edit

I'm having trouble finding the citation in footnote 9; the section does not appear to exist. Is there a typo in it? The Jade Knight (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carpetani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

It says, "Recent analysis of local epigraphic sources revealed that the Carpetani comprised some twenty-seven tribes..." (lists a bunch of tribes; these ar all red-linked). Could someone please fix this? Perhaps by creating full-fledged articles, or redirects, or simply deleting the links. I think red links look ugly.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply