Talk:Carrier preselect

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Proposed Merge

edit

Since the other carrier preselect page has almost no content that is not already present in this article, I am proposing merging it into this one. This article can then be expanded. Disphenoidal (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I disagree as the two pages describe two different things. Carrier Pre-select is where a telephone exchange is setup to route one consumers phone calls via an alternative network. The Carrier pre-selection talks of using least cost routing for a PBX which are mainly used in large businesses. Carrier pre-select doesn't use least-cost routing as all the comsumers calls are routed via one network provider regardless of the number dialled. Dasx199 (talk) 11:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

These should be merged. Carrier preselection removed the need for both PBX users and consumers to dial prefix numbers to route the call. The reason for using CPS, either for LCR or consumer preference, should be discussed in the article Junkmanuk (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carrier preselect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply