Talk:Carrow Abbey

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted because...no WP:before --98.163.75.189 (talk) 01:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

notable per grade I building. 98.163.75.189 (talk) 01:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
User:I dream of horses your deletion of references is disruptive, take down the wrongful speedy tag. 98.163.75.189 (talk) 01:21, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would like to commend Mr. 98.163.75.189 for saving this page from my speedy deletion, and making this page a pretty decent page as far as decentness goes. I would be glad to see this article skyrocket from here. hewhoamareismyself 01:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Carrow Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply