Talk:Carry On (Supernatural)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Soaper1234 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Carry On (Supernatural)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Soaper1234 (talk · contribs) 00:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I'm going to review this article. My comments are below. Soaper1234 - talk 00:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • The plot mentions a song being played, so should this be mentioned in the infobox?
  Done
  • Sam → Sam Winchester
Wouldn't that sound repetitive? "Sam and Dean Winchester" sounds better than "Sam Winchester and Dean Winchester".
Yeah, happy to let that go.
  • Add a comma after together
Expanded sentence so no longer necessary.
The new clause in the sentence is not mentioned - or sourced - anywhere in the article.
  Done Removed.
  • Add "to the show" after conclusion
  Done
  • Merge final sentence into the second paragraph.
  Done

Plot

edit
  • Characters need wikilinking and full names on first mention.
  Done
  • All characters need actors in parenthesis.
  Done
  • Missed Bobby's surname.
  Fixed
  • Context for characters and things such as "Roadhouse" and "the Impala" is needed in the plot.
  Done
  • Need context for who Castiel, Jack Kline, Rufus Turner, John Winchester, and Mary Winchester are.
  Fixed
  • Perhaps only link the "14 years prior" bit.
  Done
  • Remove "in Heaven" from final line.
  Done

Production

edit
  • Add "cast members" before Jared Padalecki
  Done
  • The longest-running show fact needs a source.
  Done
  • Add "Showrunner and executive producer" before Andrew Dabb.
  Done
  • Change "the March 23 episode" to "episode 13 of the season, broadcast on March 23".
  Done
  • Change "shutdown due to the virus outbreak" to "shutdown in production".
  Done

Reception

edit
  • It is very quote-heavy, so can you paraphrase some bits?
  Done

References

edit
  • All looks good.

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Notes

edit
@Soaper1234: All of your suggestions have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Soaper1234: All of your new suggestions have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Happy with everything. Could you change the link to the Impala to Impala (Supernatural) to make use of the redirect? Once that is done, I'll pass this. Soaper1234 - talk 14:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Soaper1234:   Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Passed! Well done   Soaper1234 - talk 15:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply