Talk:Carter's Little Liver Pills

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:1000:B16B:9D3D:1DE0:5164:43FB:31A6 in topic Years in production

While I appreciate the entry, leaving a blank spot in a saying that was popular before I was born is not useful. If it's "shit" (because of the bisacodyl) put "shit" (or whatever the appropriate word is) in the entry so that it makes sense to more people.66.135.89.24 (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC) The blank is the correct "word" because various words were (are) used in that place, i.e. brains, money, houses, or anything else as the situation warrants24.167.210.37 (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Is the date given, 1951, for the name change accurate? I was born in 1949 and I still think of the product as having the word "liver" in the name because that's how I always heard it as a child. Of course, it might just be from having my parents using the name. JDZeff (talk) 01:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I heard them, in TV commercials, called "Carter's Little Liver Pills" at least until the mid-60's. There's a youTube video from 1961 showing that full phrase. Google:
Carters 'Little Liver Pills' 1961 TV commercial
By 1975, "Liver" is gone, another ad video. JohndanR (talk) 00:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carter's Little Liver Pills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Original ingredients

edit

An old issue of Advertising Age reports the original ingredients were 16 mg of aloe and 4 mg of podophyllum resin. Who would like to find a better source and augment the article? What is the effect of aloe and podophyllum? Did any competitive products use the same formulation? Snezzy (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

what was changed?

edit

This sentence is awkward and puzzling:

The active ingredient was changed when it was renamed in 1959 to be the laxative bisacodyl.

It seems to suggest that the change to bisacodyl was a consequence of the renaming of "it". Does "it" mean the pill? Or was bisacodyl adopted in 1959 as a new name for the same ingredient? —Tamfang (talk) 05:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Did these pills work, or was it pseudoscience?

edit

Equinox 20:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

American Crow or Cape Crow?

edit

The pills' inventor came from Erie Pennsylvania, so judging from the picture in the ad, and finding no evidence to the contrary, I changed the species of crow from Cape crow to the common American crow.CharlesHBennett (talk) 11:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Years in production

edit

Article needs further detail. If these are available today, or if these are discontinued, it should be noted. 2600:1000:B16B:9D3D:1DE0:5164:43FB:31A6 (talk) 03:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)Reply