This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Relevant sources
editThis is a brief list of relevant sources I compiled that could be used to improve this article. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 22:29, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
rickriordan.comShmoop character analysisSadie Shmoop pages exist on the books as well.- EW 1st crossover "Percy and Carter are my touchstones"
- Pub Weekly 1st crossover
- CSMonitor 1st crossover
Guardian on whitewashingBustle on whitewashingPluggedIn Bk 1 review "Authority roles", "Belief systems", information on appropriateness of various elementsAllreaders.com Bk 2 review "character growth"- CommonSenseMedia Bk 1 review "Families can talk about Carter and Sadie's relationship. Why did Carter envy Sadie's life with their grandparents?..."
Kidsreads Bk 1 review- NPR "Carter and Sadie are biracial characters, but Riordan doesn't dwell on this in the book. He is more interested in the idea of kids being caught between two worlds, a concept to which he says his readers can relate..."
- Women of Grace "Introducing children to the concept that possession by spirits is okay so long as you’re doing it for the right reason is just plain irresponsible..."
- Hypable Demigods and Magicians
Guardian Bk 1 review- Hypable Graphic novel
[1] Muse review- Pub Weekly "From chapter to chapter, the siblings tag team as first-person narrators. 'I didn't know how that would be, telling a novel from a first-person point of view from a 12-year-old British girl,' said Riordan..."
Left to be done
editI just finished "spinning" the three sections on the books more towards a character description than a plot summary. Now all that's left is to redo the "Description" section and its subsections -- to add sources and out-of-universe perspective. More references anywhere would be lovely, as would a brief section on any character development that happens in the crossovers.
I'd also like to see an image for this article, at least to illustrate the "whitewashing" controversy, but there could be problems finding/using fair-use media to fit that need. I've done pretty much all I can do for the moment however, so another editor is going to need to take up the crusade. -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)