Talk:Cartographic generalization
Latest comment: 4 months ago by 37.47.100.112 in topic Selection process vs bad data
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
edit- I'm working on this page --- it needs help! The information's all there but not presented in the best way possible. --rocketrye12 talk/contribs 23:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 | This article may have been copied and pasted from another location, possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. |
Librarian lena (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am working on overhauling this page for the next couple days (August 2020); it may be a mess for a bit. Bplewe (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Completed with my overhaul. It's not perfect, would be great for some generalization experts to work on it, but I think it is baseline quality now. Bplewe (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Selection process vs bad data
edit"This OpenStreetMap map of Oklahoma shows the challenges of automated Selection from raw GIS data. The gaps in the highways are not due to missing data, but to shortcomings in the selection process."
note that it is not fully accurate - part of the problem was that road data was not so well classified. Note that now, with the same selection method map is better as data was fixed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=7/34.343/-99.613