Talk:Cartouche

Confusing line

I came across this line in the article; "The use of cartouches by prominent queens became commonplace during the New Kingdom, when it was used not only by Great Royal Wives, but by other queens as well, a cartouche is Hannah Kelly it is not clear what determined if a queen was entitled to it." However, it appears to be poorly written and slightly confusing, especially the last half of it. Not to mention I have no idea who Hannah Kelly is or why her name was stuck into the line seemingly erroneously. My guess is that it should go something like this The use of cartouches by prominent queens became commonplace during the New Kingdom when it was used not only by Great Royal Wives, but by other queens as well. It is not clear what determined if a queen was entitled to it. But that seems as though something might be missing from it. Any thoughts?98.215.128.112 (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

 Done: Line not in article any more. --Vollbracht (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Demonstration of bugs in WikiHiero

<Aa1 G43>

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eequor (talk • contribs)

What shall be shown and what doesn't work? Your first example shows up quite well if written

<hiero>< Aa1-G43-I9-G43 ></hiero>

result:

Now about the second: is there any example to be found in Egypt with a cartouche written in an other one? --Vollbracht (talk) 15:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

more other meanings

this is not a good website whenever i go on here i can NEVER find my answer SAME — Preceding unsigned comment added by H\HellNo bro (talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Me too! Yesterday I was looking for a cookie recipe. Didn't find it here. --Vollbracht (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done: No question - no answer!

A question

The first part of the article tells us that the term was first applied to the Egyptian symbol by soldiers. Assuming these are the soldiers of Napoleans foray into Egypt C. 1800 (where French soldiers common in Egypt before then?) this seems unlikely given the term's prior use in europe for a similar symbol. Coincidence or folk etymolgy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ae7flux (talk • contribs)

What similar symbol? --Vollbracht (talk) 15:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

graces section

this stupid website dosnt say what catouches are made from!!! i need it 4 an assignment! arghhhhhh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.5.103 (talk) 06:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Ink, paint! What are words and icons made from? The answer is clearly given on this site. --Vollbracht (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)  Done

why?

Why would cartouches of Kephren and Pepi I be found in Ebla? 4.249.63.83 (talk) 23:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Merge?

Should we merge this article with Cartouche (hieroglyph)? Peter Chastain (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

I support that, since this article is wholly about its occurrence in hieroglyphics. RCopple (talk) 20:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)  Done: Has a redirect here already.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cartouche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110615170023/http://www.sis.gov.eg/PDF/Ar/History/0809000000000000210001.pdf to http://www.sis.gov.eg/PDF/Ar/History/0809000000000000210001.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)