Talk:Cartwright
Latest comment: 3 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 29 September 2021
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
editCould someone make a disambiguation page for other Cartwrights?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.192.150 (talk) 23:59, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Requested move 29 September 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved all per nom. No such user (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cartwright (disambiguation) → Cartwright
- Wainwright (disambiguation) → Wainwright
- Wainwright → Wainwright (occupation)
– The current primary topic Wainwright is a poorly written stub article that shouldn't be the primary topic, given the large number of people and places with this name. Ditto for Cartwright, which is currently a primary redirect to said article. Per WP:NOPRIMARY, the disambiguation page should be at the base title for both. 162 etc. (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. The four-sentence stub for "Wainwright" certainly does not delineate a subject of such great primacy that "Cartwright" should redirect to it. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support the occupation appears to get the most views of things called just "Wainwright"[[1]] but not overwhelming especially when you take into account the building getting more. To me in England the walking meaning would be primary and that's what comes up mainly in Google but that's probably partly due to my location. The Canadian place gets a compareable number of views[[2]] to the occupation. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support all per nom. The words are archaic (for that matter, the occupation is archaic), and the use as a name is more common. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.