Talk:Casartelli Building

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 81.102.129.30 in topic incorrect photo note

incorrect photo note

edit

The pictured building is incorrect. Picture is not the Casartelli building, neither old nor new. The actual building is curved and on a corner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.102.129.30 (talk) 01:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Untitled

edit

look at this ref: http://thefilter.blogs.com/thefilter/architecture/index.html AND READ THE BIT ON THIS BUILDING 'HISTORICAL PORNOGRAPHY' IS ALMOST GOOD ENOUGH TO BE in the article.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Casartelli Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

the picture is not of the Casertelli building sadly 109.144.18.1 (talk) 15:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply