Talk:Casimir Pulaski Day
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Chicago may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 11 dates. [show] |
'Star-crossed lovers'
editI corrected a bit of information in the media section to remove an indication that the story in the referenced song (Sufjan Stevens) was true (as best I can tell, it is not.) However, in writing this section, I used the phrase 'star-crossed lovers'. Given that this phrase can be a bit of a trope, I wanted to point it out here and suggest that any offended editors may remove it. It really is a beautiful, moving piece of music, though - I recommend you listen to it before you edit the section. 67.155.193.130 (talk) 01:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah it is one of my favourite songs. I've always seen the main theme of the song as the death of a friend though, who was also a little bit of a girlfriend. 84.9.145.222 (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Chicago Polish population
editDoes anyone know how accurate the claim is/was that Chicago is second only to Warsaw in Polish population? It is stated in the article Chicago that it has the largest population outside Poland. Polish American states that the number is around 1M for the State of Illinois. Although Warsaw is 1.6 M people, I don't think any Polish city has more than 800,000 people. However, I would guess, the population distribution of Chicagoland being what it is, that a lot of Poles are living in the suburbs. What about other cities?
- That claim is no longer in the article and is mainly relevant in the Chicago article. --Dhartung | Talk 20:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't think any Polish city has more than 800,000 people. Think again
- Indeed, at least 6 or 7 (if you include their suburbs, that is) 78.86.18.55 (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- This claim seems to have crept in again - I'm removing it. It's too similar to many other untrue factoids I've seen ("Melbourne has biggest Greek population outside of Athens, NY has biggest Italian population outside of Rome", etc. etc.) Slac speak up! 03:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
List of U.S. cities with large Polish American populations, using U.S. 2000 Census data, puts Polish descent in the city of Chicago (210,421) second to New York City (213,447). In 1999, according to List of cities and towns in Poland using Central Statistical Office of Poland data, at least 16 cities in Poland had a population greater than 210,421. So Chicago doesn't even have the highest Polish count in the US, let alone in Poland. --Closeapple (talk) 04:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
NY Pulaski Day
editThe NY Pulaski Day Parade (link) is held in October, on what is referred to here as General Pulaski Memorial Day (link following), so I think it belongs there, not here. Philadelphia has a parade in October too. I (Philly native) have only heard of the October date referred to as just "Pulaski Day." I think a more prominent link to the "other" Pulaski Day would help clarify too. BillFlis 14:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'll write something clearer, it was bugging me, too. --Dhartung | Talk 20:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Milwaukee
editI removed this paragraph:
- Pulaski Day can be a source of great confusion in the City of Milwaukee. As it is an official holiday of the Milwaukee Bar Association, no mail is allowed to be delivered. As it is still delivered in the rest of the country, lag times can occur in interstate business transactions as covered in the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution.
I don't understand how the US mail, a federal writ, can be subject to a local bar association rule. I think we need to insist on a citation for this. --Dhartung | Talk 20:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Two Holidays
editSeems the two holidays (General Pulaski Memorial Day & Casimir Pulaski Day) should be merged into a single article. Both articles essentially have the same content. Javadane 23:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --GGreeneVa 14:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. Kolbe 20:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- I am removing the merge tags because these are seperate holidays. General Pulaski Memorial Day is held every October 11, while Casimir Pulaski Day is observed on the first Monday of every March. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Illinois
editSufjan Stevens's album is entitled Illinois, although "Illinoise" appears on the album cover. I have changed this entry to reflect this. 69.207.146.165 05:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Going to bed early?
editThere has been an edit on this article for a while now that claims "Many observe Casimir Pulaski Day by going to bed early." Can anyone verify this? The edit was made by an anonymous user and it seems like somewhat bizarre vandalism to me. Thoughts? Lenge001 (talk) 07:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Downstate Illinois
editThis article implies that Casimir Pulaski Day is a school holiday for Chicago Public Schools. In fact, the rest of Illinois also observes this holiday. I grew up in Central Illinois for much of my youth. I recall the holiday only coming sometime into the 80's. I believe the history of this holiday as described is incomplete. Martalli (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Needs to be checked if this is still a school holiday. Ace-o-aces2 (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Album title.
editIs the album title "Songs About Fucking" really necessary? It really interrupted the flow of the article for me.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Casimir Pulaski Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091108105837/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/ap/20091107/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_us_citizen_pulaski to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091107/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_us_citizen_pulaski
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111016202707/http://www.pulaskidays.org/objectives.htm to http://www.pulaskidays.org/objectives.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080117050759/http://www.eiu.edu:80/~insight/pulaski/pulaski.htm to http://www.eiu.edu/~insight/pulaski/pulaski.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)