Talk:Casitas del Sur case

The word "minors" is unfortunate.

Whilst of course it is totally correct, in the DYK link that points here it looks like a spelling mistake, that it should be "miners". If they are under 18, it would seem to be just as correct, and far less misleading, to refer to them as "children". Old_Wombat (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Casitas del Sur case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130726203836/http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2012/03/08/una-cuidadora-del-albergue-casitas-del-sur-es-arrestada to http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2012/03/08/una-cuidadora-del-albergue-casitas-del-sur-es-arrestada
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140103232234/http://www.m-x.com.mx/xml/pdf/177/30.pdf to http://www.m-x.com.mx/xml/pdf/177/30.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Assessment as Start class for Crime WikiProject

After reading this article, I am not clear about what parties are being alleged to have committed which crimes. There is no real cohesion in the article, so I am left confused. Therefore, I fail to understand why this article has been rated as a C class article. The references are there but the key information is not. Like: What were the irregularities in 2005? Why are children being admitted to the shelter and by whom? Is this backed by a child protection legal process or is this a charity providing a voluntary child welfare aid directly to families? It took me a while to even work out where this is happening in Mexico. The information in the lead section does not really summarize the case, rather it looks like the precursor events are in the lead along with some allegations then the article jumps into one case then another group of cases in the different sections. There is no background about the way the Mexican justice system and social services are expected to handle child care, protection and welfare cases or explanation of the legal status of children and parents before Mexican law. The sections do not provide an accessible structure; they only serve to divide the text up and disorganize it. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Article Evaluation Project

I recommend that the article could include some background about how in the Casitas del Sur Case, it led to awareness about how there were a network of similar shelters that used Christianity as a cover for trafficking and abuse, or also the role of Jorge Erdely Graham in the crime as well. These viewpoints may be underrepresented. The article is well written and draws from a wide array of sources. Alecprofit (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)