Talk:Casparian strip/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet (talk · contribs) 06:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Apologies, but I'm going to have to quickfail this, per quickfail criteria #1 ("it is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria") and #3 ("it has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid"). The article is heavily studded with cleanup tags in both the lead and body, and likely requires more than it has. There are a number of basic Manual of Style issues with the lead (four heavy, dense paragraphs for quite a short article), citations and notes (which are placed inconsistently throughout the article without paying attention to the punctuation), and general weight of sections (which are quite scrawny compared to the lead). The article's prose also requires a fair amount of copyediting beyond the scope of what a GA review alone can perform. Vaticidalprophet 06:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)