| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editWhy exactly is this classified as an advertisement-ish page? It doesn't seem to have much gushing or anything of that sort, for a band that barely exists there's not really much to represent either way, I don't see how it conflicts with any neutral POV issue.
Some clarification would be nice, I wrote the original version and it has recieved editing but I certainly never had an advertisement in mind. Thanks.
Piro1 19:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- The reason I added the ad tag was that the article spends most of its time addressing what songs are available and what work has been done on the website. (For example, I removed most of the links to the song downloads.) The article should talk about the band's history, members, musical style, things like that. -- Merope Talk 20:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)