This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Castanospora is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Pay attention to what you guys are doing please, bots and humans. You don't need to list the author 3 times, do you? What's the point of that? von Mueller's name is listed under the genus, it doesn't need to be put anywhere else twice more. If you want to move it somewhere to be in line with whatever format of the week Wikipedia has decided upon, go for it, but just have the name listed once. Not too hard to do, is it? Peter196808:01, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually, it is necessary. The species name is not necessarily by the same author as the genus name (and very commonly, it isn't), so the species author does need to be indicated to show it is the same. What (F.Muell.) F.Muell. shows is that the species was first described by Mueller in a different genus Somethingelsia alphandii F.Muell., and then later transferred by Mueller to the new genus Castanospora.
It is true that F.Muell. doesn't need to be wikilinked on each occasion, but that's an entirely separate issue. - MPF08:27, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply