Talk:Castiel (Supernatural)/GA2

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ophois in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
The article is pretty good, but before I can pass it I need you to fix the following:

  • The "Character background" section is too detailed and hard to understand for someone who hasn't seen the show. For example, who/what is "the Witnesses", the "66 seals", and "Azazel"? I suggest you shorten the section down and make it a bit more explaining.
    • I purposefully didn't expand upon things like those because they have articles themselves that expand upon them. Do you mean just put stuff like "the demon Azazel"?
      • Yes, that's what I mean.
        • Okay, I went through and added some stuff in to make it make more sense, in my opinion at least. Do you mind looking through it real quick and seeing if that helped?
          • Yeah, it definitely looks better. I will take a closer look tomorrow morning, though.
  • In the "Characterization" section, you need to explain who Collins is as it is the first time he is mentioned outside of the lead.
    • Done
  • Contrary to angels in television series such
    • Done
  • the main direction that Kripke gave him of the character is was that there is
    • Done
  • Link Kim Manners
    • Done
  • Link TV.com and TV Squad in the "Reception" section (also, TV Squad should not be italicized as it is a website).
    • Done
  • described the concept of Castiel as "genius" and the actor Misha Collins as
    • Done
  • Remove the links to January and 2009
    • Done
  • In January 2009, Supernatural was renewed for a fifth season – italicize Supernatural
    • Done

Other than that, nice work! I will put the article on hold for seven days so you can fix this. Good luck! TheLeftorium 17:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I still think the Plot section is a bit long and complicated, but it's good enough for GA status so I'll pass the article. TheLeftorium 16:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 16:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Ophois (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply