Talk:CastleCops

Link to German forums

Added German Forums link--Mrrockford 11:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Symantec and Google references

Added symantec and google references. Also labeled all references by organization. --Ikester 00:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Changed google reference from google.ch to google.com. --Ikester 05:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

This definition links to Wiki copy cat site

Please see this. Buchloe 21:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry just noticed this. I'm not sure what the section title refers to nor do I understand the relevance of the referenced article. --Ikester 04:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

CastleCops staff who have Wikipedia articles

Should we have a "See also" section listing staff members who also have Wikipedia articles? Folks like Dave Kleiman? --Kimon^talk 19:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I see you've added Dave's reference. Seems like a great idea ... though how does one go about establishing that? Also aren't WP articles owned by the collective? I.e. Dave doesn't actually "have" any WP articles does he? -Ikester (talk) 14:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Closure

There needs to be more data about this. What happened to their wiki, and can we summarize the programs they recommended? Their work with collective computing? Surely all the former members didn't just pack up and quit, they must have joined other organizations or maybe formed a new one. Tyciol (talk) 01:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Ikester (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[quote]The deletion notice records two problems: This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2009) This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the Wikipedia editor's particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of experts. (June 2009)[/quote]

• This article needs additional citations for verification:
  

How many are required?

• This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the Wikipedia editor's particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of experts:
  

It does? Sorry but I don't see that. Perhaps it was re-written from an earlier version? --Ikester (talk) 16:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CastleCops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206154623/http://blog.spywareguide.com/2007/01/celebrate_with_castlecops.html to http://blog.spywareguide.com/2007/01/celebrate_with_castlecops.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070214123237/http://www.castlecops.com/ to http://www.castlecops.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)