Talk:Castleford–Garforth line
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 5 February 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved to Castleford–Garforth line. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 01:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Castleford to Garforth Line → Castleford to Garforth line – Downcase per WP:NCCAPS; sources mostly do not cap it. Optionally, say if you prefer to use the symmetric dashed version (Castleford–Garforth line) rather than "to" between place names. Dicklyon (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Evidence in sources
Please examine the searches, see if there is a common name, whether the dashed version is preferred, and whether caps are preferred. It is my impression that there is no proper name here and that the dashed form is more logical and more consistent with other such lines. Possibly Castleford–Garforth branch line as in some sources. Dicklyon (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support as nom with preference for dashed form, either Castleford–Garforth line or Castleford–Garforth branch line. Dicklyon (talk) 23:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support - no preference on titling though would prefer a dash. The joy of all things (talk) 23:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.