Talk:Castlevania: Harmony of Dissonance/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll be reviewing this article throughout the next few days. The Good Article criteria are posted below for reference. As I see that the article passes a particlular piece of the criteria, it will be updated with a symbol. The second section below is where I will post my comments. I will continue to post things I find throughout the next few days until I state I'm finished finding issues, however, anyone may choose to start fixing these issues at any time. --Teancum (talk)

GA-Class criteria

For further detail, see WP:WIAGA

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Issues

• player-character should be player characterY
• "Harmony of Dissonance makes use of the forward dash move" -- "the forward dash" should be "a forward dash"Y
• "role-playing games (RPG)" -- (RPG) is not necessary unless you refer to it as such later in an articleY
• The Reception section relies very heavily on quotations. Please limit those, and summarize what has been said.
• Some references list the publisher as IGN, others IGN.com -- these need to all be marked as IGNY
• "Game Informer" as a publisher in Ref 38 should be italicized. It's also a dead link, so if you can get an archived version from www.archive.org that would be best.Y
• Publishers should only be wikilinked for the first reference. Every other reference after that should not be.Y

DONE - I didn't find much. Good job! Let me know when you've addressed these.

I've marked issues that have been addressed. --Teancum (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I tried to limit the quotes in the reception and I think that all of the issues have been addressed now. Kaguya-chan (talk) 20:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

All issues have been accounted for. PASS -- Great job! --Teancum (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)