Talk:Cathedral Basilica of St. Joseph (San Jose)

National Historic Landmark?

I have searched the National Park Service web site, and though I can find the Cathedral listed on the National Register of Historic Places, it is not included on the NPS's list of National Historic Landmarks (every National Historic Landmark is included on the National Register of Historic Places, but not every place on the register is a designated historic landmark.) I know that the Cathedral website says that the place is a National Historic Landmark, but I think their webmaster might have misunderstood the NPS's designation. I'm removing from the article the WP category of National Historic Landmark. If somebody has more up-to-date information indicating that the designation is correct, they can restore it. Whyaduck 15:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm moving it back.

The article was recently moved from a title with a disambiguator seperated by parentheses to one seperated by a comma, with a note that it was done to bring the title to "normal style". I contend that this is not the normal style. Looking at Wikipedia:Disambiguation, I see that the parentheses style of disambiguation is presented as a general style to use, while the comma style is only suggested as a possibility for place-names, with their higher administrative division used to disambiguate. As this article is about a building, not a settlement or other geographic place-name, that style is not supported by policy. In accordance with our policy on disambiguation, I'm moving it back. Gentgeen (talk) 04:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

rated sfba importance

Rating WP:SFBA importance as mid, as it is a California Historical Landmark, and really could use some attention and work from the task force to improve it. -- Alvincura (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I agree, i will try to fix up a bit.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cathedral Basilica of St. Joseph (San Jose, California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012205719/http://www.cathedralsofcalifornia.com/ to http://www.cathedralsofcalifornia.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)