Talk:Cathedral Quartet

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Curdigirl in topic Copy edit run

Where?

edit

This article doesn't seem to mention where this group practiced/was located. Mar de Sin Speak up! 23:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

They were based in Stowe, Ohio. Word that in however you like. Daniel J. Mount 01:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Stub

edit

I changed the class to stub (which is what it should have been from the beginning), because after all this time, it still is. Even though there is a lot of text, there's only one reference (and that's in the lead, where it really doesn't belong). There are some users (one has been blocked) who keep adding things without adding any sources. --Musdan77 (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cathedral Quartet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copy edit run

edit

Hello, This article was flagged with fanPOV since 2008 so I took a run at it. I found a lot of peacock phrases and claims that were not substantiated or supported by information in the provided sources. I am a member of the Copy Editors Guild and since the article had multiple issues, I also flagged it for a second review by someone in the guild. Quick update on what I did:

  1. Checked all the sources - some claims I found no support for such as the reemergence of popularity of Southern gospel being due in large part to Bill Gaither's recording of the 'Homecoming', a tribute album. This makes me think there's a bit of synthesis or original research happening throughout the article.
  2. Flagged primary source claims pointing to website of one of the group members
  3. Removed peacock terms and rephrased sentences where no citation supports the claim being made - generally things about how wildly popular the group was at certain points.
  4. Flagged claims that need citations
  5. Flagged other claims that seem just vague but not quite peacock terms as according to whom (just a call on my part)

The article could use a pair of eyes from the Copy Editors Guild to give this a once over. I did not lift the POV tag because I'm not convinced I got everything and I think the article needs more cleanup. That's it. Cheers! Curdigirl (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply