Talk:Catherine Bracy
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Fettlemap in topic Political operative
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Political operative
editHi,
I implore you to read the "Techequity" website. It clearly advocates for changing the California tax code. Since this lady leads that organization, I'm not sure why the claim she is a political operative needs a reference. If an organization seeks changes to the tax code, that makes it a political organization, and that makes Ms. Bracy a political operative!
Please point out where my reasoning is faulty. I am trying to improve articles in this space, and I thought this article masqueraded this organization and person as "technologists" seeking to "open technology". Uh, no. It's 100% political/lobbying.
69Avatar69 (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- @69Avatar69:Wikipedia:No original research is a fundamental principle for Wikipedia editors. Your preferred description involves original research. I reviewed the secondary or tertiary sources for the acceptable description for this person rather than forming my own opinions based on a website. I moved the discussion from my talk page since this is not personal issue and other editors may wish to comment about this article. Fettlemap (talk) 00:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)