Talk:Catholic Health Association of the United States
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Health care reform under Barack Obama
editSome pro-life activists within the Church have criticized the Catholic Health Association of the United States for actively supporting health care reform under Barack Obama, given the fact that such reforms would presumably include provisions making it possible for American secular governments to publicly fund abortion procedures with taxpayer money, something which is controversial when taken in light of the Church's strong opposition to direct abortion. [1] ADM (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- CHA itself is now expressing some concern its conscience protections aren't sufficiently broad.[2][3]. I may add this to the article.--T. Anthony (talk) 01:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
What? Where's the article?
editHuh? That's it? I came here to read about the CHA and the only thing this article talks about is Obamacare? CHA is nearly a century old. According to its website, the CHA is "Comprised of more than 600 hospitals and 1,400 long-term care and other health facilities in all 50 states, the Catholic health ministry is the largest group of nonprofit health care providers in the nation." Surely there must be just a teensy bit more to say about the largest non-profit health care provider in the US than just the ACA controversy. A place holder would have been more informative.
I nominate the whole article for deletion.
Controversy over terminating pregnancy
editThis is worth mentioning in the controversy section, isn't it? [4] Ignostic199 (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Catholic Health Association of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120912220132/http://www.omaha.com/article/20100319/AP09/303199881 to http://www.omaha.com/article/20100319/AP09/303199881
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2010/mar/10031704
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)