Talk:Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 131.181.251.10
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
So which way did the House of Lords rule? It is not clear from this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.60.90.1 (talk • contribs) The last edit said the court held there was no infringement, but this is incorrect. I have edited the last line to correct it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.137.100.211 (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
This Wiki entry has been criticised because it does not cite references. I am of the view that this criticism is unwarranted. The entry cites the court decision itself. This is a sufficent citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.181.251.10 (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)