Talk:Catskill Mountain Railroad

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 5, 2017

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Mid-importance).

A bunch of new images

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just uploaded a bunch of images to Commons that I took on vacation last summer. I'm sure the hard-core railfans here can categorize them better than I can and select some good ones to use in various articles. Feel free to edit the image descriptions on Commons as appropriate. Have fun.

-- RoySmith (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Need more citations

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This article is missing several citations in the paragraphs describing the conflict between the railroad company and Ulster Count. This has been a very contentious situation, and most of the material contributed has clearly been written by pro-railroad writers with no attempt to avoid loaded words and biased point of view. I have noted where citations are needed to give some time for previous contributors to add them. I changed wording in many places to be more neutral. Prairienut (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 11:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC) It appears that much of this article is original research and/or first hand experience not drawn from secondary sources. The more controversial points should be removed until they can be supported via proper citations. ^^^^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prairienut (talk • contribs) 21:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

In the paragraph on the Dec. 15, 2015 Ulster County resolution under "Threats to Service" is an uncited, unattributed opinion. I have asked for a citation. If none is provided within two weeks (Dec. 31, 2015), I will be removing the following sentence: "This resolution effectively ends the fight on rail vs. trail on the former U&D corridor, with rail and trail proponents pledging to work together from now on." Considering the more than 160 pointed comments on the cited news article, it appears the rail vs. trail controversy is not over. I will also remove certain sentences that I marked "citation needed" several months ago. These mostly describe goals of CMRR and are uncited. These statements need citations to reliable secondary sources, especially because they are not consistent with the recent resolution. Prairienut (talk) 14:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I will wait at least another week before starting to remove statements that seem questionable and are not cited. Before removing a statement, I will first try to find a source and add the citation. I would appreciate help with this. If anyone knows of secondary sources (books, newspapers, websites) that support statements marked with "citation needed", please add the citation in the appropriate format. Thank you for your assistance in improving this article. Prairienut (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Catskill Mountain Railroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lack of citations and poor page structure

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As previously noted by another Wikipedian in 2016, this article has far too many uncited facts and claims. It also contains trivial information that results in a page that is far too long considering the importance of the topic. It reads in a stream of consciousness way lacking real structure and has received a C rating on the content assessment scale. Most of the uncited information should be removed: there are interesting, detailed claims that would be suitable for a personal website or perhaps even a book on the history of the railroad, but is not appropriate here. I have added a few citations and will add some more for items I can, but I will be removing a large number of statements that are questionable and not cited. Tagging for 3 recent editors: @Eehiv @Davidng913 @16ConcordeSSC

-MrRobertGoulet Mrrobertgoulet (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic