This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Wikipedia is not a repository for ads.
I found the reference for the quote from the Discovery journalist. It is available at [1], however, the webpage does not list the source for any of the scientific studies to which it alludes so the quote is dubious and possibly misleading. I'm not an expert on these situations on wikipedia so I would like to alert someone more knowledgeable to the situation and hopefully get it resolved.
sat (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply