Talk:Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem

Latest comment: 1 year ago by EggRoll97 in topic Requested move 17 September 2023

Explain End(V)

edit

The statement of the theorem says that A_i is in End(V). That notation should be explained. LachlanA (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Done! The discussion of abstract vector spaces and endomorphisms is, in my opinion, pointless. I've replaced this by a statement in R^n or C^n. I've kept the discussion of abstract vector spaces and endomorphisms, but I've moved it later. The original page claims that theorem was valid in any vector space. I think it's only for real or complex vector spaces. Can anyone verify this? 129.215.104.124 (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Relation with Cauchy problem

edit

I'm not familiar with this topic, how does the Cauchy-Kowalevski relate to the Cauchy–Lipschitz? Don't they both address the existance of unique solution for the Cauchy problem? --Marco4math (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

wrong direction?

edit

either I am completely confused or f goes in the wrong direction:  should be there instead of  

--Diogenes2000 (talk) 23:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

The link to the reference Kowalevski, Sophie seems to be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.108.69.177 (talk) 14:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 September 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


Cauchy–Kowalevski theoremCauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem – Appears to be more common according to Google and Google Scholar, and is in line with the article on Sofya Kovalevskaya. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.