Caught in a Moment has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 10, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Caught in a Moment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Caught in a Moment/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 14:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Info box/Lead
- Mayfair Strongroom Metropolis → Is this how it's written in the booklet? No 'Recordings Studios'?
- "Caught in a Moment" is a song by English girl group Sugababes, released as the fourth and final single from their third studio album Three (2003). → "Caught in a Moment" is a song recorded by English girl group Sugababesfor their third studio album Three (2003). It was released as the albums fourth and final single.
- I don't really like this :/ Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Too much is going on too quick, just keep it simple. Say which album it is from first, then say it was released as a single. As a track is always a song first before it is a single. — AARON • TALK 09:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I don't really like this :/ Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- song is downtempo → song is a downtempo
- It is reminiscent of the group's ballads "Stronger" and "Too Lost in You", → Why? Could sound a bit bias.
- Removed Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Upon release, the song became → Following its release, "Caught in a Moment" became
- Background and release
- During 2003, the Sugababes began working on their third studio album Three (2003), in which they wrote and recorded material while they travelled around the world and performed on tours such as the Liverpool Summer Pops. → This isn't working. During 2003 implies all of 2003, and you can't begin something for the duration of the year. Suggest changing to: In 2003, the Sugababes started to record songs for their third studio album, Three (2003). They wrote and recorded material in various countries around the world as they performed at various musical events such as the Liverpool Summer Pops.
- The album's fourth and final single, → As the album's fourth and final single,
- Wrote something similar Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Composition and lyrics
- produced in a similar vein to the → and its production is similar to the
- According to the digital sheet music published by Hal Leonard Publishing, → Useless info
- I believe there is a requirement to cite these things Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's not, I've never included it since I was told not to include it. — AARON • TALK 09:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Removed Till 09:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's not, I've never included it since I was told not to include it. — AARON • TALK 09:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I believe there is a requirement to cite these things Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It was compared to the works of girl groups All Saints and Massive Attack. → Massive Attack is also a girl group?
- No, fixed Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I made some changes to this section.
- Chart performance
- on 26 August 2004 issue → on the 26 August 2004 issue
- Live performances
- In regard to → With regard to
- Credits and personnel
- The personnel bit really needs to be two columns, it's far to long a list.
- It used to be like this but was really ugly and bulky. I think it looks better as a long list Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It looks uglier and bulkier as one really long list. — AARON • TALK 09:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not really. Till 09:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It does, it would look a lot better if it were two columns. Articles which have credits with a fifth of this amount have two columns. — AARON • TALK 16:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not really. Till 09:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It looks uglier and bulkier as one really long list. — AARON • TALK 09:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- It used to be like this but was really ugly and bulky. I think it looks better as a long list Till 04:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Status
On hold. — AARON • TALK 14:41, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed everything thanks. Till 11:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Passing.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.