Talk:Cauldron (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

My main concern with this artical is how short it is, and that you have mixed the gameplay with the plot.

Concerns:

• Make a plot section separte it from the Gameplay.
• Look for more reviews if you can.
• It has a sequel so make a section of legacy or sequel with info about devolopment.
• But it it has a sequel add some info on the artical
• You do not link the devoloper in the artical.
• Consider having it copy-edited

There's not to many faults but the ones that are here are quite big so work on it, i will put it on hold for some days. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

The only point I addressed so far was the Palace Software link in the article. In regard to the others:

• The plot in the article is only two sentences. I can probably elaborate it to three, but the game's plot is very simple. That's why I integrated it into the gameplay, because the plot is very short and mainly serves as a brief explanation for the setting and objective.
• The few reviews not included were redundant to what's already in the article. Basically, adding them won't really lengthen the article.
• Same this with the sequel. The basic information is so short, a separate section felt like undue weight. There is information about development, but it felt best to include that in its own article: Cauldron 2: The Pumpkin Strikes Back.
• I will seek a fresh set of eyes to copy edit the article.

I know this article is short, but I tried to make it representative of the coverage received (which wasn't like what games normally receive today). There really isn't much that can been done about that aspect. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 12:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC))

The articles has been given a sweep. Let me know if you have any other suggestions. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC))

No more, it's done, paass. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 02:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)