Talk:Cavalia

April 2007

Hi, Excuse me but I totally disagree with "similar to a horse circus" =) I'm an horse-rider, I have seen lots of horse shows and you just can't say that Cavalia is similar to a horse circus... it's something REALLY different, unical. It is an insult made to Cavalia to compare it with a circus =) Moreover, it is written in their book "Cavalia, un rêve de liberté" that it is something different than what already exists. You just can say that it is an horse show. 195.132.51.17 14:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC) PS: Sorry for my bad english !

Copyright vio?

This article is largely based on text from this website, which may or may not be copyrighted. On the other hand, that website may have taken its text from this article. -M.Nelson (talk) 23:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

2012

I believe the previous comment by user M.nelson is either erroneous or outdated. The linked page does not contain articles on Cavalia, nor does it seem to contain its own copyrighted material, but is only a search engine. This article does require further sources though, I’ll be working on this. Coordoweb (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

The website simply expired. The owner probably did not want to pay to renew the domain registration, so the website is now just a parked domain. Now we can no longer verify if a violation of copyright occurred. Regardless, the article requires quite a bit of revision, especially for tone and style, as well as removal of trivial information. 99.122.238.88 (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Cavalia logo cmyk.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Cavalia logo cmyk.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 10 March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Cavalia logo cmyk.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cavalia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927074926/http://cavalia.net/files/cavalia/melbourne_au_-_press_kit_full_-_as_of_august2.pdf to http://cavalia.net/files/cavalia/melbourne_au_-_press_kit_full_-_as_of_august2.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.montrealgazette.com/Cavalia%2Bgets%2Bmillion%2Bjump%2Bproduction/1631924/story.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140819125733/http://www.cavalia.net/en/cavalia-show/tickets-info/singapore to http://www.cavalia.net/en/cavalia-show/tickets-info/singapore

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)