This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
A fact from Cece Carlucci appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 February 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that baseball umpire Cece Carlucci made the umpiring equipment used in The Natural?
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article meets eligibility criteria - newness and length. A bit on the shorter side, but, meets DYK minimums. Start class biography. Article is well sourced and has no issues with tone. Earwig's copvio detector does not surface any major issues. Hook 1 is sourced to a Californian article from the 90s, made available via newspapers.com. Hook is verified by the source. I am assuming that the movie watching public know of this film and hence contributing to the hook's interestingness. The second hook is also sourced to the Californian made available through newspapers.com. Both hooks are used in the article. QPQ is done. Solid nomination. All green. Well done. Ktin (talk) 03:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply