Talk:Cellular One

Needs Improvement

This article isn't really correct. See this site--Cellular One seems to be a coalition of franchised wireless providers. Yes, Western Wireless owns the trade name, but they license it to many companies--so there IS a relationship between Dobson and Western Wireless. I'm also familiar with Cellular One of San Luis Obispo (California), and I've noticed that all of the Cellular Ones have the same red light/bold CELLULARONE logo.

I will research this more and add as I have time, but if anyone else can focus on this, I'd appreciate it.

cluth 12:16, August 10, 2005 (UTC) (updated 10:16, 19 October 2005 (UTC))

I also recall that the Cellular One was just a group of independant cellphone companies, one of which included McCaw Cellular, who's network was sold to AT&T Wireless. Other independant pieces gave up the franchise name to create a new name (such as part of the Cingular network).

I was hired by Dobson a month ago, and right before leaving work today received an e-mail (all employees did) stating that AT&T is buying the company.

Not so Fast

Of course it is known that the merger is completing between AT&T and Dobson. Though it hasn't been set in stone what will happen to the Cellular One trade name yet. I'm just saying don't jump to conclusions, and let things happen first before changing information in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmoz2989 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Chinook Wireless

It seems as though one of Montana's wireless networks, Chinook, is changing branding to Cellular One. I wonder if they bought it?--Warpzero 18:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't believe it has been. Cellular One is an affiliate name. So it could be just a name change. But I could be wrong.Strunke (talk) 04:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cellular One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cellularone.com/PR_network.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080113175653/http://sec.edgar-online.com/2001/07/02/0000950130-01-502841/Section3.asp to http://sec.edgar-online.com/2001/07/02/0000950130-01-502841/Section3.asp
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120718061031/http://sec.edgar-online.com/2003/03/11/0000950144-03-002920/Section11.asp to http://sec.edgar-online.com/2003/03/11/0000950144-03-002920/Section11.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)