Talk:Celtic settlement of Southeast Europe

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Mid‑importance

	Celtic settlement of Southeast Europe is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gaul Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

city foundings

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Somebody should integrate the information that celtic tribes setteld in modern day dobrudja and founded citys (aliobrix,noviodunum,Durostorum....)11:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.112.83 (talk)

i'm just wondering does anyone thnk that the story of Giantogomy might be based on these invasions, I mean celic was associated with the earth, like giants who grew on the earth and the snake does appear in celtic art — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.63.104 (talk) 19:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

After the Greek campaigns section

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This section has many grammar mistakes (near the end of it) and is generally bad. It starts with mentioning the opinion of "some" "scholars" without describing who they are and how prevalent their views are and then goes on to discredit them with the personal opinion of the author with no evidence for it at all. I suggest it be removed until rewritten. 89.210.169.135 (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Settlement section needs more sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.232.76 (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

INCOSISTENCY

about the battle at thermopylae you say that the greeks returned to the fleet and survived. you do not mention anything about fighting. in the article about vrennus(3rd century BC) at the part of the article about the thermopylae battle it says that greeks lost the battle and ONLY the surviving part of the athenean army returned to the fleet and survived. which of these 2 is correct?

Top image

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How do we know that the top image represents a Galatian? Other than the description from Commons, the source for which is unstated—presumably the label at the İstanbul Archaeological Museum where the object is housed. But we don't know. This is an ongoing problem with images from Commons. Cynwolfe (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bottom Image

The bottom image is not exactly correct. It is dated to 50 B.C., but the Albani were unknown to history at that point and then for another 200 years afterwards. Even then, their geographical extent is unknown (and was believed to be much more localised than shown).

HamilcarVuk (talk) 13:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The Brennus (3rd century BC) article has relevant material better placed here; move? Klbrain (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposal withdrawn; better to keep in WP:SUMMARY form, perhaps just cutting down the Brennus (3rd century BC) section. Klbrain (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic