Talk:Censorship of Wikipedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Censorship of Wikipedia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Blocking of Wikipedia by the People's Republic of China page were merged into Censorship of Wikipedia on 24 December 2011. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Wikipedia completely blocked in Russia?
editHey @Superb Owl. Sorry for linking a 2023 Reuters article in my edit summary. I had a brain fart and thought it said 2024.
However I still think you might be mistaken on this issue. The sources you linked say things like For now, Ruwiki exists alongside Wikipedia's Russian-language version
(link). Can you please reply with a quote from one of these sources that explicitly says that Roskomnadzor has blocked access to the Wikipedia domain? If such a quote isn't available, I would suggest self-reverting per WP:BRD. Thanks for your help on this. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae, you are right, I wasn't thorough enough in vetting the article (which was written by an intern) and came back to self-revert. Apologies for the mistake Superb Owl (talk) 07:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- No problem at all. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Prosecuting readers?
editThe subsection § Prosecuting readers seems to be nothing but speculation and borderline WP:OR. (Its single citation doesn't even mention Wikipedia, and supports only a tiny fraction of the paragraph.) I'm looking for sources to improve it with, but otherwise I think it should just be deleted. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)