Talk:Center for Advanced Research and Technology
This article was nominated for deletion on 20 September 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reads like an ad
editThis article has serious problems which need to be addressed:
- It reads like an ad. All the language is gushing and over-glorifying. Therefore, the whole article is highly POV and needs to be toned down.
- It makes numerous claims that aren't backed up by any references at all. E.g. "is considered by many to be a school of the future." Just who are these "many" people? If there are a lot, it shouldn't be too hard to find a reference somewhere. Lacking such references, the POV claims should be removed.
- It has too much unencyclopedic detail. Wikipedia is not for duplicating other websites. All the information on credits, prerequisates and other details should be removed: such information does not belong on Wikipedia. That information should be on the school's website, not ours.
- It doesn't establish why the school is WP:Notable. We don't want every educational institution listed, just ones that deserve mention.
Lacking such changes, I'll nominate it for deletion. — Frecklefoot | Talk 18:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I will try to fix this article. Plasmoe 05:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Cart 144x179.jpg
editImage:Cart 144x179.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Center for Advanced Research and Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131106024135/http://www.cart.org.php53-12.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/13-14_CART_Brochure.pdf to http://www.cart.org.php53-12.dfw1-1.websitetestlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/13-14_CART_Brochure.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)