edit

why does the bank of russia have the double eagle without the crown, when the official coat of arms of russia is the double eagle WITH the crown? why this inconsequence? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.18.129.112 (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Profits?

edit

The article says that half the profit of the bank goes into the government budget. But WHO GETS THE OTHER HALF? Rwinkel (talk) 04:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Put into reserves, according to the statutory provisions. SchnitteUK (talk) 10:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The 1966 Federal Reserve publication Money, Banking, and Credit in Eastern Europe states: “In the communist countries, money is created in the same way as in capitalist countries – through the extension of bank credit. This fact is not generally recognized or accepted in the various countries of Eastern Europe. The result is that a good deal of confusion emerges from their economic literature with regard to the nature of money and the role of the monetary process and the function of the banking system.… Since Marx identified money with gold, the official theory holds paper money to be merely a substitute for gold and ignores deposit money.” (p. 42-43) http://www.monetary.org/intro-to-monetary-reform/faqs Rwinkel (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Moorrests (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Who are the shareholders of the central bank of Russia?

edit

Who are the shareholders of the central bank of Russia? Nmout (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central Bank of Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

The intro presents the topic as "Central Bank of Russia aka Bank of Russia". This suggests the official name is CBoR, and BoR is just a common alternative. Let's assume for a second CBoR is what the entity is most commonly called in English (this is itself uncertain), even then, the intro should still read "Bank of Russia aka Central Bank of Russia" since its official title is clearly "Bank of Russia". Its logo says this in both English and Russian – neither contain the word "central".

While the Wikipedia article usually uses the most common name, even if it is not official, the intro sentence usually still uses the official name – e.g. Chase Bank introduces the entity as JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. because that is its offical legal name. Likewise, given that its own logo and publications refer to itself as the Bank of Russia it appears the intro should read "The Bank of Russia, aka the Central Bank of Russia" - 2A02:C7F:F330:4500:78B5:4C71:751B:ED1A (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply