Talk:Central Security Service
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Central Security Service article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Special Collection Service page were merged into Central Security Service on 08:31, 30 June 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Untitled
editSome sources for information on the Central Security Service include:
- http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/css.htm
- http://cryptome.org/nsa-ussid18.pdf
- http://cryptome.org/nsa070605.txt
- http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/nsa/stories/timeline/
70.104.254.121 11:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Description of the Naval Security Group Command might be better served in a distinct entry linked from here. More on NSG at
http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/navsecgru/index.html
70.104.254.121 00:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the paragraph on NSG reads like promotional material; NSG is simply one of the elements of the Service. I have deleted it. 68.52.90.93 (talk) 18:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Unorginized
editThis article needs work, I don't know the approprite tags for it, I'll work on it. Sephiroth storm (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
"Enemy"
editThis can not be used in a serious sense in an encyclopedic article. I mean, really? "Enemy"? I don't think I need to explain why this is inappropriate. It has nothing to do with political and ideological convictions, but rather proves that this is written from a very specific POV rather than an informative NPOV. Who is this enemy? Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 23:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)