Talk:Cerro Romualdo

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bricology in topic Relabeling as mountain

Relabeling as mountain

edit

I propose that all referrals in the article to Cerro Romauldo as a "hill" be changed to "mountain". At 1,300 feet in elevation, Cerro Romauldo already satisfies the opinion of many people that eminences greater than 1,000 feet in elevation are mountains rather than hills. At least as importantly, Cerro Romauldo has considerable topographic prominence -- it rises about 1,000 feet above the immediately surrounding terrain; it is also detached from all other nearby peaks, and is steep from all approaches. In short, Cerro Romauldo looks like a mountain. Unless someone makes a compelling argument to the contrary, I'll change all references of "hill" to "mountain", to suit. Bricology (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Finally corrected the use of "hill" to "mountain", to refer to Cerro Romualdo. The article on "hills" states "Geographers historically regarded mountains as hills greater than 1,000 feet (304.8 meters) above sea level..." and at 1,300 feet, Cerro Romualdo certainly qualifies. Bricology (talk) 01:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cerro Romauldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Misspelled everywhere in article

edit

The correct spelling of the name is "Cerro Romualdo", not "Cerro Romauldo". Most other sources spell it correctly, going back to the 1861 United States Supreme Court case, United States v. Wilson, 66 U.S. 267. The name "Romualdo" belonged to a Chumash man who received the land grant from Pio Pico in 1846; this grant was titled "La Huerta de Romualdo" (approximately "the garden of Romualdo"). [1]https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/66/267/ Bricology (talk) 00:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply