Talk:Cerro Tuzgle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Will get to this soon. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Lead

• I think the details in the first line should be repeated in the main article.
• Any idea on how the volcano gets its name?
• "Crater" may be linked
• Sulfur was formerly mined on the mountain Since when has this stopped?

Regional setting

• (La Negra formation^[6]) This is generally written as (La Negra formation)^[6]
• It would be good to link "faulting" and "Puna". Puna is linked in the next section, but this is the first mention
• 16 and 28° south add "latitude"
• 20 and 24° latitude add "south"
• geochemistry and geographic indicators Should it be "geochemical"?
• travertine deposits (24°10′S 66°40′W) Why are coordinates provided only for this?
• from 4,400 metres (14,400 ft) altitude south to 4,100 metres (13,500 ft) altitude north What is "altitude north/south"?

Local setting

• Ordovican is linked twice and Miocene is a duplink
• An image or two more would go well with the text.
• A low gravity field anomaly is also found in the area This is something interesting. Anything more on this?
• Can we have subsections for better navigation?
• northnortheast-southsouthwest Can be written as "N-NE to S-SW"

@Sainsf: Addressed a number of suggestions. Several notes:

1. Not sure how to integrate the first sentence into the article. Probably something in the "local" section.

It has to be integrated, I leave it to you to decide which place would hold it best.

1. There does not appear to be information on when the mines were abandoned or what the etymology is.
2. Probably better to stick with "geochemistry", it can be used as a nount like that.
3. The travertine deposits are a bit away from the volcano, but I think that we could lose that citation.
4. Not sure what subsections to use. Maybe a "petrology" section for the chemistry-related info?

Alright, do what is possible.

1. Linked the gravity anomaly thing; not as interesting as it sounds, unfortunately!

That's for now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. I have struck or the resolved issues. I'll list the rest of the comments in a few days, a bit busy now. Cheers! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

• Worked somewhat crudely on the remaining two issues.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Alright, those done, here are a few more comments from the rest of the article.

• Link rhyodacite (Composition and origin)
• Duplinks: thermobarometry (Composition and origin), ignimbrite, Pleistocene, Holocene (Activity), Miocene (Geothermal area and sulfur)
• a company named Geotermina Andina What sort of a company? Mining?
• are already exploited "already being"?
• Puna should be linked at first mention.
• The climate of the Puna is arid nowadays "nowadays" is implied, and thus redundant
• What are orbital changes?

That should be it. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

• @Sainsf: I think I got these.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Very well, this can now be promoted. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)