Talk:Cervical screening

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ambiemurph.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Meseigbe, Kamwiki123.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Reason for new article

This article has been created because the Pap test article contains content that is generally about methods for cervical screening but is not actually the PA test. That content will be moved here. There is also detailed screening information in the Cervical cancer article that might be better off in this article.Alexbateman (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

There's already an article on Schiller's test but it isn't mentioned here. Should it be? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

That is a diagnostic test, not a screening test. More apropos to Colposcopy. Zodon (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Notes to self or anyone

• Australia: The National Cervical Screening Program. The program promotes routine screening with Pap smears every two years for women between the ages of 18 (or two years after first sexual intercourse, whichever is later) and 69 years. [1]

• UK NHS FAQ: Why can't women have cervical screening until they are 25?
• france, 25-65, [2], Germany too.

Wiki CRUK John (talk) 16:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cervical screening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140226191503/http://www.cdc.gov:80/excite/skincancer/mod13.htm to http://www.cdc.gov/excite/skincancer/mod13.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscerv.htm,
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calculator/calc.shtml?calc_rx_rates.shtml?eer=37.0&cer=63.0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cervical screening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cdc.gov/excite/skincancer/mod13.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720105059/http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calculator/calc.shtml?calc_rx_rates.shtml%3Feer=37.0&cer=63.0 to http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calculator/calc.shtml?calc_rx_rates.shtml%3Feer=37.0&cer=63.0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

New Article Modifications

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MjIMLSRwjaNQ6WqGgxNGyu7cWAZkgfqL71wMk8-E128/edit?usp=sharing

Please feel free to comment on our plan if you have any thoughts.

I really love the new section on new innovations in the cervical screening. It helps the readers to know what the current scope of the progress in the field is. I would include another citation after you talk about the reduction in use of annual pap smears. The only other concrete edit I would suggest is to expand on the p16/ki-67 biomarkers. This will help balance out all the new innovations that you are discussing. - iSRAEL

In the "Emerging Technologies" section, can you clarify what "acceptably well" means? Is there a quantitative measure of this?

Maybe rephrase the first sentence of the second paragraph to,"Another promising approach is visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), which must be further analyzed to consider it for public health initiatives" for grammar and flow. - Michelle

Wiki Education assignment: UCSF SOM Inquiry In Action-- Wikipedia Editing 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 August 2022 and 20 September 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dashdon, Vlee2013 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Artsenic17, MS2random, 00ik00.

— Assignment last updated by MS2random (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi all we are students from UCSF editing the Cervical Screening page. Below is a summary of our edits:

-Updated citations to include most up-to-date guidelines

-Updated Introduction to include equity initiatives by the WHO in cervical screening rates

-Updated recommendations section with new guidelines

-Added "co-testing" section to Type of Screening

--Added new table of management guidelines for screening results/risk assessments

My teammate will update this when their edits are live.

Dashdon (talk) 06:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Dashdon 09/15/2022

Hello, we have made the above edits and published them. We also added to the section on screening in low-resource settings Vlee2013 (talk) 23:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 January 2023 and 25 February 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mpograd2 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Deets2023.

— Assignment last updated by Deets2023 (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello,

I am a student from the University of Illinois College of Medicine. Here is a summary of the proposed edits I will be making.

Intro: Rewrite to include added information detailed below and mirror structure changes. Clarify definition of cervical screening.

Screening Process: Keep first paragraph on general screening process. Rename: General Screening Process Procedure. Add paragraph on self-collection. Remove Section of "removal of abnormal cells". New section on "management of abnormal screening results" will be added toward the end of the article which will include this information.

Types of Screening: Reorder to match introduction. Molecular, Cytology, ADD in Visual. Leave Co-testing as a section but move follow up guidelines to section on management of abnormal results. Shorten HPV testing section, its not the primary focus of the article to provide such a lengthy history of the test and it is causing imbalance in this section of the article.

Recommendations: Make each region a sub heading so you can easily click it. Add in WHO general recommendations from 2021.

Management of Screening Results: List common follow up options that may be recommended by patient's healthcare provider as next steps when the screening test yields an abnormal results. Such as colposcopy, surveillance, reflex HPV testing, excisional or ablative removal.

Let me know if anyone has any thoughts or recommendations. Thanks! Mpograd2 (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)