Talk:Cetaceans of the Caribbean
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Cétacés de la Caraïbe from fr.wikipedia. (1057619847 et seq.) by Combava (D. Sirett) |
Comments for review
edit@Anomalocaris: Hi! Do I need to answer the comments you made before the draft is accepted or not, since it's mostly cosmetic? I will work on it but I may not have the time immediately. Thank you for your fast review anyway! Nereus&Co (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nereus&Co: I'm not a reviewer. I think my recommendations are all good, but it's probably fair to say that draft reviewers are mainly looking for other things besides strict compliance with the WP:Manual of Style. —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris: Ok thanks. I will check your recommendations anyway they are indeed necessary (the format of the references may take longer tough). Nereus&Co (talk) 17:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Everey species and genus should be in italic now. All ref are now after period or comma as asked (which I find strange). i think 2 letter postal abreviation are also corrected. Nereus&Co (talk) 02:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Note to the editors
editIn academic life not only the content but also the citation is very important. So adding bare references and not attempting to turn them into full citation is not a desired act. If you don't want to put your effort then why you started this article. There can be some bare references in any page, but the rate of the bare refs in this page is not reasonable. Wish there are much more strict rules against those who always put bare references. Egeymi (talk) 09:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)