Talk:Château de Puilaurens

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / European / French / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Copyvio or mirror site?

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The text of this article, as created 10 April 2006, is very similar to, but a shortened version of, that of this website which claims copyright 2010-2016. (And which was an External Link in that first version though it disappeared in the meantime till I added it again just now). I don't know which way the copying went. A copyright expert might be able to work it out - pinging @Diannaa:. PamD 21:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing the article creation back in 2006 shows the website was at that time http://www.languedoc-france.info/120717_puilaurens.htm (note this redirects to the current url http://www.catharcastles.info/puilaurens.php?key=puilaurens). The old url was archived several times by the Wayback Machine so we have proof: much of the content is copyvio from that site. But there's enough left to rescue a stub. I will fix it now. Thanks for the report. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic