Talk:Château de Rosny-sur-Seine
 | A fact from Château de Rosny-sur-Seine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 November 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Rosny or Rosny-sur-Seine?
editShouldn't this be Château de Rosny in the commune of Rosny-sur-Seine? --Wetman 19:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- This was my idea, too. That's why I started the redirect. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I just used Château de Rosny-sur-Seine, because that was the title at fr:. Looking around the web I see some at Château de Rosny-sur-Seine, some at Château de Rosny, and a few at Château de Sully. I'm fine with either. DVD+ R/W 21:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- The commune has that name to distinguish it from Rosny-sous-Bois. I think the château is simply Rosny; but the French now call the Château de Maisons, "Maisons-Laffitte", as the commune is now (rightly) called. --Wetman 02:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
a remarkable man?
editIf the chateau is truly "famous as the birthplace and seat of Duc de Sully, who built it in 1599", then he is remarkable for having been the first man in history to have built his own birthplace. Perhaps a little rewrite would be appropriate.131.81.200.158 13:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
State repossession
editDoes anyone know when the state repossessed the chateau from the Japanese company? Please add it to the article. I also wonder why they'd strip such a magnificent place of its ornaments in the first place. Kavadi carrier 13:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Château de Rosny-sur-Seine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20050619041234/http://www.humanite.presse.fr/journal/1996-01-23/1996-01-23-743719 to http://www.humanite.presse.fr/journal/1996-01-23/1996-01-23-743719
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061124121824/http://www.archivesnationales.culture.gouv.fr/chan/chan/fonds/xml_inv/EtatsdesfondsAP/371AP.html to http://www.archivesnationales.culture.gouv.fr/chan/chan/fonds/xml_inv/EtatsdesfondsAP/371AP.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)