Talk:Chabad-Lubavitch related controversies

Latest comment: 7 years ago by I.am.a.qwerty in topic Multiple merge proposal

Action Taken

edit

I have sought dispute resolution on the issue by a third party.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chabad-Lubavitch related controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Multiple merge proposal

edit

This page is useful in that it becomes a single source for all "Chabad-Lubavitch related controversies," however, I would argue that it is un-encyclopedic in its nature (it's basically a list of unrelated incidents spanning 200 years) which is discouraged under WP:Criticism and this page has in the past and presently become a dumping ground for negative news stories relating to individual Chabad rabbis. I propose the following "multiple merge" solution which I believe is fair in preserving existing content but moving it to more relevant pages.

I will add a merge tag on the page though the tag won't reflect the fact that this is for multiple merges. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 23:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Or rename to "Criticism and controversies related to Chabad-Lubavitch". Debresser (talk) 19:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
While you're at it, change it to "Criticism and controversies and lawsuits related to Chabad-Lubavitch" I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 22:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
I've moved criticism and lawsuits and individualized sections to their respective pages, what's remaining are 3 strictly movement-wide controversies, one of which (Chabad messianism) has it's own page, the other two are already covered on Chabad offshooots page (and on other pages). Time to merge. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply