Talk:Chad Booc
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Alivemussel in topic Booc et. al Case Decision + Lock Article?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Booc et. al Case Decision + Lock Article?
editA new decision just came up from the court that handled Booc and two co-defendants on human trafficking cases: [[1]] Not sure how to put it there in an encyclopedic fashion—I'm more concerned with copy-editing and typos.
Also, should we lock this article? Seems like a lot of vandalism cases have happened in this article, mostly from people who don't own a Wikipedia account. A live mussel (talk or contribs) 18:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, bad formatting. Here's the link: https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/06/25/2365539/davao-court-acquits-red-tagged-ip-leader-trafficking-cases A live mussel (talk or contribs) 18:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)