Talk:Chadarangam
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Sources
editPlease make sure some reliable sources added to this article. The article was already removed once (actually redirected into Indian chess) due to missing sources. Andreas Kaufmann (talk) 09:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
How does this variant differ from international Chess? From the description given, it seems to be nearly identical, the only difference I can see is that stalemate is considered a win instead of a draw, but it doesn't seem to me that that's a sufficient difference to justify a whole page as opposed to simply a reference in the stalemate page XinaNicole (talk) 04:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- It also appears to be missing castling, en passant, rules on repetition, etc. But this could be just due to poor documentation. Promotion is also different. Idiacanthus 12:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
How do we know this variant isn't manufactured?
editOne source is none source, and this all seems way too similar to modern Chess to be a historical variant. PLMMJ (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Assuming the source is accurately reflected, this could just be what some people used to call modern Chess in Tamil. 73.202.248.28 (talk) 21:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- So then it's not a real chess variant and should thus not have a page. PLMMJ (talk) 18:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)