Talk:Chamberlain v Surrey School District No 36
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4-2 vote?
edit"A majority of the Surrey District School Board, including chair Mary Polak, and trustees Heather Stilwell, Robert Pickering, Gary Tymoschuk, Shawn Wilson, Kim Evoy and Pam Glass, voted to deny the requested approval."
Something is wrong with this. The board had seven trustees (six plus a chair) and we know from James Chamberlain's article on EGALE that it was a 4-2 vote (whereby the chair would probably vote only to split a tie). The way it is written suggests that all seven voted to ban the books which would then not be correct. Two of those listed must have voted to allow the books yet I have no idea which two. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esptoronto (talk • contribs) 10:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC).
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chamberlain v Surrey School District No 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050429190329/http://www.egale.ca/index.asp?lang=E&menu=70&item=59 to http://www.egale.ca/index.asp?lang=E&menu=70&item=59
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)