Talk:Champlain Canal
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Champlain Canal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table of locks
editA table listing the locks might be useful, similar to Erie Canal#Locks. This could be done by copying the existing Erie Canal listing, and then modifying it appropriately with the Champlain Canal data, if it can be found. Reify-tech (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Clarify/add detail on route of Champlain Canal
editThe use of the word "follows" in the description of the Champlain Canal route is not clear to me:
"The canal begins about 3 miles (4.8 km) north of the locks at the Troy Federal Dam, at the point where the Erie Canal splits from the Hudson River. The Champlain Canal follows the Hudson River north for approximately 35 miles (56 km), with six locks providing navigation around dams on the Hudson River, until it reaches lock C-7 in Fort Edward, New York."
I assumed this meant the canal runs parallet to the river, the way the Erie Canal runs parallel to the Mohawk River. But the following sentence made me think maybe it means the Hudson River itself is considered to be the canal in that section:
"At this point, the canal follows a constructed channel for approximately 25 miles (40 km), with five additional locks, bringing the canal to the southern end of Lake Champlain at Whitehall, New York."
Since the canal from Ft Edward to Whitehall "follows a constructed channel", and the word "constructed" is not used to describe the section from Troy to Ft Edward, I am guessing the latter is not constructed, i.e. the "canal" is actually the river. But I'm not sure.
Some clarification of the wording and a map of adequate resolution would be helpful. m.m (talk) 20:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Canal template?
editShouldn't this be using the Template:Infobox Canal instead of Template:Infobox NRHP? It's more than just a historical place, it's in active use... --TheAnarcat (talk) 20:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Recreational Uses
editRecreational uses by kayakers and others would be an informative section to add. I have photos and would like to add this section, if others agree.--Wikipietime (talk) 12:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Champlain Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628005458/http://www.history.rochester.edu:80/canal/bib/whitford/old1906/ to http://www.history.rochester.edu/canal/bib/whitford/old1906/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060419065143/http://www.history.rochester.edu:80/canal/bib/whitford/1906/Chap06.html to http://www.history.rochester.edu/canal/bib/whitford/1906/Chap06.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070207121333/http://www.nyscanals.gov:80/maps/map7.html to http://www.NYScanals.gov/maps/map7.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)