Talk:Chana School
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chana School article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Chana School has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page rating
editIf I was a member of the Illinois Project, I would rate this article as Class A, Importance/Priority Mid based upon all the improvements it has seen. Many a couple more copyedits can bring it up to GA status soon. Ronbo76 13:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Chana School District
editShould this be Chana District School? (am unfamiliar with the topic, but the current wording seems wrong) Cricketgirl 09:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- No, the actual district no longer remains, this is just the building that is historical. I am not even sure that a school district could be considered historical either.--Kranar drogin 10:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Probably depends on the disrict. Kranar is right though, this article is specifically about the school building. IvoShandor 18:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
GA Pass
editWell done, good references, enjoyable read. Automated peer review suggestions:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
- See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 5 feet, use 5 feet, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 5 feet.[?] - Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DoomsDay349 01:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
edit- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Chana School/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
GA Sweeps: Pass
editAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to update the access dates for all of the sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chana School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090531053539/http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/listing.htm to http://www.nps.gov/history/nr/listing.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)